Ethics Blog

previous postprev | main | nextnext post

WikiLeaks and Diplomacy

December 7, 2010

There are many different ethical aspects to the recent release of diplomatic confidential information by WikiLeaks. The story has three different levels as well.

You first have the original person who leaked them. There is no doubt in my mind that he or she broke the law and committed a crime. The White House Press Secretary said: “Open and transparent government is something the President believes is truly important, but the stealing of classified information and its dissemination is a crime.”  I would be interested to know what was his or her motivation; Was it for money, fame or for some political and personal convictions?

You then have Mr. Assange who posted them on his website. The very purpose of WikiLeaks is to disseminate confidential information. Should WikiLeaks even be allowed to exist? The U.S. government would like to shut it down. The ethical dilemma here is how to resolve a conflict between the two legitimate values of transparency and confidentiality?

Finally there is mainstream media that published and continues to publish their contents giving the “cables” more exposure and to a larger public. I tend to believe that once they were posted on the WikiLeaks website, they became public. It is therefore, in my view, acceptable for mainstream media to publish them because it allows a public debate on both the values of transparency and confidentiality as well as on America’s diplomacy. As the New York Times commented on its November 30th editorial, “The documents are valuable because they illuminate American policy in a way that American and others deserve to see.” I however believe that the diplomatic cables will certainly have a chilling effect on the work of diplomats in the future. Professor Paul W. Schroeder, author of “The Transformation of European Politics 1763-1848″ in his NYT December 3rd. Op-Ed says: “Secrecy is an essential part of any negotiations: no corporate merger, complicated legal settlements, amicable divorce could ever be reached without a level of confidentiality.”

What really interests me is the question of whether you can be a diplomat and also be ethical? Carl von Clausewitz once said that: “War is a continuation of diplomacy using other means.” Can you be ethical in war? The answer is yes because we have the Geneva International convention that rules the way we conduct or should conduct war. I do not believe we have an international convention that regulates the way we conduct diplomacy. What we may need are ethics guidelines for diplomats. Maybe the WikiLeaks episodes or fiasco, as some believe they are, will push our leaders to think seriously about creating such guidelines.

Daniele Vare, the Italian author once said:

Diplomacy is the art of letting someone have your way.

If only it was that simple!

| Add a comment | Permalink

 

previous postprev | main | nextnext post

 

Comments (3)

December 10th, 2010 at 1:37 pm Posted by Dan Wheeler

This Wikileaks story has so many ethical elements.

How do you view the obligation of companies like Visa, MasterCard and PayPal not processing donations?

 

December 10th, 2010 at 2:07 pm Posted by Emmanuel Tchividjian

I have no information on the contractual-legal obligations of these companies with Wikileaks. Assuming that their contracts allow termination, I think they have a right to do so.

We have the moral and sometimes legal obligation not to participate in illegal activities.

In our ethics Ruder Finn Ethics Guidelines, we say:
“We do not want to get invovled in any (public relations) activity WE believe interferes with crime prevention.”

We should also be allowed to decide who we do business with and if a client gets involved in a activity we believe is illegal we should always have the option to terminate that relationship.

 

December 10th, 2010 at 10:02 pm Posted by Rocky Lichtenwald

As much as we more or less hate Wikileaks - The Lines that have been drawn are unclear. The technological advancement of websites for example like Twitter can leak information in an instant. I myself don’t like over-control of the public domain (the internet) - But I fear we won’t have much choice.
If confidential document attacks continue by Wikileaks I feel our nation has to take appropriate measures necessary, legal steps to protect integrity of the country affected.

See … Wikileaks seems to acting globally. As such a more fortified attack against Wikileaks requires a global attack. The internet is structured as a global resource for us. In this new social web (were really still at the infant stage) we need a World Court to pass sentance.

 

Post Your Comment 

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


(you may use HTML tags for style)

Subscribe