Home > Corporate & Public Trust > Ethics > Ethics Blog > Blood Money

Ethics Blog

prevprev | main | nextnext

Blood Money

March 31, 2008

The New England Journal of Medicine just published an article about a lung cancer study that could save your life if you are a smoker. The study conducted by Dr. Claudia Henschke of Weill Cornell Medical College revealed that 80 % of lung cancer deaths could be prevented by CT scans. However the study was indirectly funded by the Ligget Group, which is a cigarette company! Many foundations and not for profit organizations refuse donations from the tobacco industry.

There are different ethical aspects to this complex issue.

Lack of Transparency: The funding for the study of $3.6 million came from an unknown not for profit organization call the Foundation for Lung Cancer: Early Detection Prevention & Treatment. However the Foundation was itself funded by the Ligget group, a tobacco company. The Editor of the New England Journal of Medicine was unaware of the connection. Some studies have been made that indicate that sponsors give money for research to influence, in their favor the outcome of the study, hence the incentive in sponsoring the research in the first place.

Motivation: What was the true motivation of the Ligget Group? Dr. Jerome Kassirer, a former editor of the New England Journal of Medicine believes that the motivation was to diminish the seriousness of lung cancer. He said: "They want to show that lung cancer is not so bad because screening can save people. That is outrageous."

Blood Money: Should we accept money for a good cause from an individual or corporation when we strongly disagree with the donor's views and or disapprove of his or her activities? One should not give a simplistic answer to the question. It would be preferable from an ethics point of view not to accept such donations and try to find funding elsewhere. There may be some situations however when lives are at stake where we might decide, as a last resort, to accept such donations.

Conclusion:
If you are a smoker, get a CT scan now!! It can't hurt you (you know that cigarettes will) and it could save you life. That to me is the ultimate ethical concern.


 

Digg It | Reddit | De.lic.ious

 

prevprev | main | nextnext

 

 

Post Your Comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

 

 

Internet

Internet

RF Interactive Upgrades a World Renown Global Policy Think Tank

The new website of the Council on Foreign Relations was hailed as “The Google for the foreign policy set” by Jacob Weisberg, editor of Slate Magazine.

Read more about Ruder Finn Interactive

Responsibility

Responsibility

Liz Claiborne and Ruder Finn Combat Domestic Violence

Liz Claiborne needed a fresh approach to increasing and sustaining visibility for its long-standing commitment to combating domestic violence.

Read more

Ethics Blog

Ethics Blog

Ruder Finn Introduces a Weekly Ethics Blog

The Ethics Blog discusses the significance of trust, transparency, honesty and ethical behavior in business and life today.

Read the Ethics Blog

Leadership

Leadership

The New Breed of CEOs

In MOVE! Magazine, Kathy Bloomgarden discusses the importance of CEO reputation.

Read Move!